Germany has claims to world domination, and not only it - many countries, or rather, their rulers, sin such ambitions. Well, the Germans are good warriors. They're good workers, too, and you can't take that away from them. This allows them, having suffered another defeat, to quickly restore the potential of the country's economy and get back into the fray. This pattern can be seen in the example of the last 80 years. This was the case after the First World War, when in just 20 years the country actually recovered, after which it suffered a crushing defeat in World War II, found itself under sanctions, paid huge reparations and indemnities - and here you are, it has once again become one of the most powerful economies in the world.It turns out that many people are interested in this problem - is there some kind of special, purely German explanation for this phenomenon? This is how the citizens of the world see the answer to this question.An American woman who has lived in Germany for more than 30 years believes that, yes, Germans have unique traits that help them get out of such situations. She believes that the Germans, due to their organization and pragmatism, are able to build a business with maximum efficiency. And yet - they work for the long term, that is, they do not strive for short-term successes if they can harm the long-term goal. Due to diligence and conscientiousness, as well as due to an efficient production model, Germans are able to compete internationally, although high salaries, it would seem, should prevent this. But the world appreciates German quality, so goods are bought not because of the low price, but because of their well-deserved reputation. Concern for the future of the country also explains the desire of German parents to make their children valuable future specialists, so success in school is given great importance. If the parents are not satisfied with the success of the children, then a tutor is immediately hired - and the goal is achieved anyway.An important point turns out to be industrial relations, in which partnership prevails, rather than competition, and the desire to jointly achieve good results of joint activities. The management of companies tries to keep subordinates willing to do their job well. It is noted that Germans are able to subordinate their personal interests to the interests of the whole society. In any case, they value the rule of law and order in the country highly. This awareness prevents the development of corruption and crime and helps channel the energy of all citizens into productive channels.Another user, from Russia, analyzes the way out of the military devastation of many European countries. Based on an analysis of open data, he concludes that, in general, all European countries have emerged from the crisis fairly quickly.:And the speed of the German economic recovery is not a phenomenon.:He believes that the Marshall Plan, of course, played some role, but not particularly significant, since it had primarily a political goal - to unite Europe and make its countries political allies. It is easier to rebuild the economy if technology and infrastructure are preserved. And even if the territory is destroyed, it is important to know exactly how and what needs to be restored. Apparently, Germany knew this and was able to do it - after all, it had an advanced economy before the start of the war, and the skills of the population did not go away.People involved in large-scale investments also have their own opinion on this matter. They can see the collectivism and resilience of the Germans, their high morale, which could not be broken by military defeats. When comparing the German population with the inhabitants of Great Britain, the opposite attitude of the Englishman is noticed - towards individualism. An Englishman does not accept the point of view that one can put the interests of society above one's own, and the Germans are guided by this position. An example is the German football team. Why do Germans often win? Yes, because they feel like a team - a single whole, and not a collection of individuals competing with each other. The concept of personal freedom, which Englishmen are trapped in, has an undeniable appeal for each of them, but will it save England in moments of national disaster? Of course, people mobilize in critical situations, and the memory of an age-old community, traditions, and a common destiny awakens within them. Is it worth waiting for, if, God forbid, something happens to England? It's hard to say. In difficult times, the ability to sacrifice becomes relevant. Can a complete maverick do this? Sacrificing oneself for the sake of the future of one's country is a greatness of spirit that is not appreciated in a full time. And the Germans have proven in practice, and more than once, that they can access this higher mathematics of public relations.At one time, The Economist reported that in the 50s of the last century, the famous American economist Mansur Olson traveled around Europe. So he became interested in something like the same question: why is West Germany thriving, but Britain, one of the victorious countries, is still not on its feet? The countries are similar in many ways, so what's the matter? He was unable to find suitable arguments to explain it, but in 1965 he tried to answer his question on the pages of his book The Logic of Collective Action. He analyzed the behavior of various groups united in order to obtain the greatest benefit. After much deliberation, he came to conclusions that confirmed long-known things: the larger the group with the same goal, the more difficult it is to assemble it into one fist and mobilize each participant to certain actions. In a large group, everyone will hope that the result will be achieved without his participation, due to the efforts of other interested parties. That is, "my hut on the edge" is not a purely Ukrainian invention, this trend is present in the general context.Oslon concludes that limited groups are much more effective in achieving benefits than large associations. This is followed by the second conclusion, in 1982, in the book "The Rise and Decline of Nations": small cartels, lobbying for their interests, grow into monopolies and exhaust the country. Then comes the moment of cataclysm, which sweeps away these harmful formations, and this happens most often through war. This happened in Germany and Japan, but in England, the victorious country, there was no serious war, as a result of which the old structures were completely preserved, and there was no economic renewal.It turns out that the war, destroying the country, in a sense heals it. But is it possible to find some other way of healing that is not so disastrous and catastrophic?Olson believes that, yes, there is such a way, and it is quite obvious: the citizens of the country, realizing in advance the danger from cartels and monopolies, should unite and give them a worthy rebuff. Amazing conclusion! After all, he has already proved that it is almost impossible to organize large groups of participants, even united by a common goal. However, then it was about the common benefit, and now, perhaps, the question of the survival of the country will arise. Things are slightly different. Pakistani players can instantly earn a 100% deposit match bonus of up to Rs55,000 when they use the 1xbet promo code get free bet bonus. I highly rate the 1xBet welcome bonus, but some bigger bonuses are available from competitors. For example, Stake.com has a 200% deposit bonus of up to $3000 (exclusive to our users) and BC.Game offers a massive welcome package over four deposits totalling $220,000.